On December 20, 2023, Brent will stop offering office hours.
- Video Course
- Video Course Overview
- General GMAT Strategies - 7 videos (free)
- Data Sufficiency - 16 videos (free)
- Arithmetic - 38 videos
- Powers and Roots - 36 videos
- Algebra and Equation Solving - 73 videos
- Word Problems - 48 videos
- Geometry - 42 videos
- Integer Properties - 38 videos
- Statistics - 20 videos
- Counting - 27 videos
- Probability - 23 videos
- Analytical Writing Assessment - 5 videos (free)
- Reading Comprehension - 10 videos (free)
- Critical Reasoning - 38 videos
- Sentence Correction - 70 videos
- Integrated Reasoning - 17 videos
- Study Guide
- Blog
- Philosophy
- Office Hours
- Extras
- Prices
Comment on Mayor Smith's Finances
If option E had some other
Because 'to the public' is a verb modifier and a verb modifier does not have to touch the verb it modifies.
It might not be the best option available here but it is not wrong as such. Correct?
You are correct; the verb
You are correct; the verb modifier need not touch the verb is it modifying. The issue here is ambiguity.
Choice b has another issue as
I'm not entirely sure what
I'm not entirely sure what you mean. Can you write the entire sentence?
Hi Brent! What is the role of
Good question. In most cases,
Good question. In most cases, the original sentence provides the best insight into the intended meaning. However, the original sentence must make sense.
In this case, it doesn't really make sense for TO THE PUBLIC to modify CAMPAIGN. It's somewhat redundant, since all mayoral campaigns are directed to the public.
That said, one might argue that a mayor might try to appeal the both the public AND the private sector, in which case the original sentence clarifies this distinction (although it's still a bit of a stretch :-). However, even if we don't immediately eliminate answer choice A, we should recognize that answer choice E makes more sense.
So, we might say that E is the best answer, and A is a close second.
Cheers,
Brent
Thanks Brent for your videos.
Ha!
Ha!
I'd like to think that makes my either Morpheus or The Oracle, but I'm probably more like the guy who just wanted to go back to the comforts of the Matrix :-)
You have to let it all go,
You have to let it all go, Aquintans. Fear, doubt, and disbelief. Free your mind :-)
In this sentence why "To
Glad you like the videos!
Glad you like the videos!
Good question.
This is all about eliminating the ambiguity of what TO THE PUBLIC is referring to.
In its original form, TO THE PUBLIC is referring to CAMPAIGN (since it's closest to CAMPAIGN). However, this placement makes no sense since ALL political campaigns are TO the public. So, in this case, TO THE PUBLIC is redundant.
However, if we place TO THE PUBLIC after the word RELEASE, then we know how the documents will be released.
Does that help?
Cheers,
Brent
Hi Brent,
Is there any easy way to identify that 'to the public' modifies 'release' and 'pertaining to the campaign' modifies 'financial documents'?
I asked the question "release what to the public?" and the answer was 'financial documents. Hence, I thought to the public modifies financial documents. Maybe I am asking the wrong questions?
Please help. Thanks!
If X tells us more about Y,
If X tells us more about Y, then X modifies Y.
Take, for example, the sentence: "The tall man ate quickly"
TALL provides extra information how about MAN.
So, the adjective TALL modifies the noun/subject MAN
QUICKLY provides extra information about ATE
So, the adverb QUICKLY modifies of the verb ATE
Also notice that, if we eliminate the modifiers, the intended meaning of the sentence does not change (it's just a little less colorful)
When we eliminate the modifiers we get: "The man ate"
If we take answer choice E and eliminate the modifiers, we get: Legislation requires Mayor Smith to release. Perfect!
Does that help?
are these questions getting
for the video above, I wrongly think Option B makes sense since there is a "must" in it, should have thought about modifications. But how do I detect them generally? I will rephrase my wording if it is not clear.
Adding the word MUST here is
Adding the word MUST here is redundant, since we already have the word REQUIRES.
For example, if we say "The new law REQUIRES citizens to brush their teeth," the word REQUIRES already implies that citizens MUST brush their teeth.
So, it would redundant to write "The new law REQUIRES that citizens MUST brush their teeth."
Does that help?